|
Aerosols
have both direct and indirect effects on the atmosphere.
The cooling or warming of the atmosphere due to the reflective
or absorbent properties of the particles are considered
direct effects. Reflective particles cool the atmosphere
by scattering energy from the sun back into space. Absorbent
particles have the opposite effect. They add to atmospheric
heating by absorbing the sun’s energy. An indirect
effect of aerosols is their roles as cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN). Clouds with more CCN are larger and more
reflective than those with fewer CCN, so they also add
to cooling in the atmosphere.
Aerosol size and travel distance
from origin are closely related properties that act as
controls on the net effect
of atmospheric cooling and heating. For example, volcanic
eruptions release a wide size range of particles. The larger,
silica rich particles absorb the sun’s energy, but
generally remain in the atmosphere for a short period of
time. Due to their short residence time the particles travel
a limited distance. Smaller sulfate aerosols are also released
in volcanic eruptions and these particles may remain in
the atmosphere for years. Sulfate aerosols are very reflective
and thought to be a significant contributor to cooling
in the atmosphere. After the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in
1991, a large amount of sulfate aerosols were released
into the stratosphere (upper atmosphere). The stratospheric
winds distributed the particles across a large portion
of the globe. The aerosol’s presence is believed
to have caused a 0.5 degree Celsius mean reduction in global
temperature.
Just as the production of
natural aerosols has cooling effects, there are also some
warming effects.
The particles
pushed into the atmosphere from a dust storm are made
of minerals with both reflective and absorbent properties.
The ability of the particles to absorb sunlight is thought
to have a net warming effect on area of the atmosphere
they occupy. The force of the dust storm can bring the
particles into the mid-troposphere (lower atmosphere)
where
they can be carried hundreds to thousands of miles from
their source. Soil particles released into the atmosphere
from farm fields will have a similar effect to that of
a dust storm. Soil originates from rocks and minerals
and will also have both reflective and absorbent properties.
A
large contributor to human produced aerosols is the burning
of fossil fuels (oil and coal). This combustion
is another
source of sulfate aerosols, but, because they are not
emitted with the force of a volcanic eruption, they
generally remain
in the troposphere. While suspended in the atmosphere,
many of these particles act as CCN and increase cloud
cover. The aerosols usually remain in the atmosphere
less than
a week before they are washed out by rain. The cooling
effect of these aerosols is located near the point
of origin or a short distance down wind. Because so many
industrial
facilities in North America use fossil fuels there
is
a high concentration of sulfate aerosols in this area.
URLs: Effects of Aerosols
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/20ctrend.htm#L_0338
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/pdf/aerosol.pdf
http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/CAMPAIGN_DOCS/OCDST/asian_dust.html
http://www.che.caltech.edu/faculty/jhs/research.html
http://www.unfccc.int/resource/iuckit/fact03.html
Impact of Aerosols
http://climate.gsfc.nasa.gov/research/aerosols.php
Impact of Aerosols on Clouds
and Climate
http://earth.rice.edu/mtpe/atmo/atmosphere/topics/aerosols/aero_clouds.html
Clouds Formed from Aerosols
and Reflecting Sunlight
http://www-sage3.larc.nasa.gov/solar/text/text-learning-aerosol.html
Atmospheric Aerosols Found
to Brighten Clouds
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/2002/bnlpr022802.htm

< BACK TO PBL SCENARIO
Contacts:
|
Responsible NASA official:
Melinda Cagle, Science Manager, CALIPSO
|
|