|
The
role of aerosols in Earth’s radiation budget is complex.
Depending on the type of aerosol, they can either reflect
or absorb incoming solar radiation. When they reflect incoming
radiation that energy is no longer available for use in
the Earth–atmosphere system, and can result in an
overall cooling effect. Certain types of aerosols, however,
called dark aerosols, tend to absorb incoming solar radiation
(An example of a dark aerosol would be soot, or the incomplete
burning of hydrocarbons.) This radiation is then radiated
in all directions warming the atmosphere in the vicinity
of the soot, but
cooling Earth’s surface.
Of all the solar radiation
that reaches the top of Earth’s
atmosphere, 30% is reflected back into space. This 30%
is called Earth’s albedo.
Of the 6% that is reflected by Earth’s atmosphere,
some is reflected by aerosols. Of the 16% of incoming solar
radiation that is absorbed
by the atmosphere, some is absorbed by aerosols while the
remainder is absorbed by various gaseous molecules in the
atmosphere.
As we have seen, tropospheric
aerosols including those produced by humans as well as
natural aerosols like
sand
have roles in Earth’s radiation budget. However, they
remain in the atmosphere for only a few days or weeks.
But when certain aerosols reach the stratosphere, they
can persist for years.

The Role of Volcanoes
The aerosols emitted by strong volcanic
eruptions tend to persist in the atmosphere for years,
changing Earth’s radiation budget for that period.
Unlike human produced aerosols, or other natural aerosols
that settle out of the atmosphere in a matter of days,
volcanic eruptions can spew aerosols high into the stratosphere,
where the winds can spread their effects worldwide. The
stable air in the stratosphere that lacks strong vertical
motions helps prevent some types of these aerosols from
settling quickly. Some examples of volcanic eruptions that
have apparently had an effect on Earth’s radiation
budget include Tambora, Krakatoa, and most recently Pinatubo.
After Tambora erupted in 1815, much of the world experienced
the “year without a summer.” In 1816, crops
failed throughout much of North America and Europe. Snowfalls
were reported in New England in the middle of summer. The
cold was attributed to the effects of Tambora. (See http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/history/1816.htm for more on “The year without a summer.”) In
1883, Krakatoa, another Indonesian volcano erupted. Only
Tambora is known to have been a bigger eruption in modern
times. Again, cooling, though not as pronounced as after
Tambora, was reported in many locations for the following
years. More recentlty, Mount Pinatubo, in the Philippines
erupted in 1991. The following two years saw a 1¼ centigrade
drop in average temperatures worldwide. The drop in temperatures
may have been even more pronounced were it not for the
1991-1992 and 1993 El Niño events. (See http://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/elnino/elnino.html).
Although volcanoes emit a lot of solid particulate aerosols
into the atmosphere, these tend to settle out in a relatively
short period of time. Major cooling is thought to be largely
due to large amounts of a liquid aerosol, sulfuric acid
(H2SO4) that reflects incoming solar radiation back to
space. Some volcanoes emit great amounts of sulfuric acid.
URLs: Earth's Radiation Budget
http://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/ozone/ozatmo.html
http://www.ouh.nl/open/dja/klimaat/system/crucial_role_of_aerosols_a.htm
http://denali.frontier.iarc.uaf.edu:8080/~cecile/Professional/CloudMicrostructure/CloudMicrostructureImpact.html
Cloud Radiation Processes
http://climate.gsfc.nasa.gov/research/clouds.php
< BACK TO PBL SCENARIO
Contacts:
|
Responsible NASA official:
Melinda Cagle, Science Manager, CALIPSO
|
|